Saturday, January 23, 2021

Post Inaugural Musings

Just this past week, the DC establishment deployed literally tens of thousands of troops and hundreds of miles of concertina wire to defend their presidential inauguration against a reportedly grave security threat. This impressive mobilization of more than 25,000 National Guardsmen and women, plus an untold number of active duty service members, were all there to defend Washingtonian elites from a motley band of smelly buffalo-horned and coonskin cap-wearing malcontents, mixed in with a handful of mask-less confederate flag-waving buffoons and Antifa agitators. Before you chastise me for downplaying the threat, consider this. For comparison purposes, that's 3 or 4 thousand more troops than President Lincoln required to defend the city against the very real threat of a military siege at it's peak in 1863 by Robert E. Lee's Army of Northern Virginia. (1)

Homeland Security's Deputy Secretary Ken Cuccinelli even revealed that Speaker Pelosi wanted to further play up the police state imagery by requesting the deployment of machine guns in the Capitol. Apparently in this bold new age of one-party rule, Democrats are of the opinion that nothing says national unity quite like belt-fed M2 .50 caliber machine gun nests on every street corner.

Does it really take more than two divisions of armed National Guard-members, being transported at great expense to Washington to sufficiently enforce Biden's inaugural themes of and 'healing' and 'unity'?  Or did they leave jobs, communities, and families behind, only to serve as expensive pawns in a dystopian photo op designed to stigmatize the previous administration?

It has been widely reported that a military presence was needed for security... perhaps so.  Please don't misunderstand me.  The events of January 6 were abhorrent.  I'm all for maintaining law and order.  It is a sad reality that given the current state of cultural decline, there was and will be an ever-increasing need for enhanced security - and in the current political divisiveness, that need shows no signs of lessening.  So in a practical sense, some measure of military presence certainly served a deterrence purpose. (2)

This sudden and newfound repudiation of political violence by elected Democrats is refreshing - albeit 8 or 9 months too late. (As was their confession that fences and walls really do work.) But for whatever was accomplished to deter a real or potential security threat, I humbly suggest that deploying the equivalent of more than two military divisions of armed troops may have been a bit of overkill to subdue a rather pitiful mob of unruly thugs.

And yet, evoking images of Cold War-era Leningrad or current-day Pyongyang during our national day of ceremony did serve other purposes, albeit ones that are at odds with the stated goal of American Unity. Far more insidious ones, I fear.

For one, the dark militaristic theme served very nicely to advance their disingenuous narrative that the 75,000,000 Trump voters are to be feared. Republicans, conservatives, libertarians, advocates of free markets, and the Midwestern working class people are “dangerous”, “enemies of the state”, “fascists”, and “insurrectionists”. Every sort of ad-hominem label has already been applied to Trump, his appointees, and his devotees going on four years now, so the obvious next step is guilt by association: Trump is evil, those several hundred insurrectionists are evil, therefore you people who supported Trump are evil, capable of anything, and can't be trusted. So we had to call in the troops.

Mark my words, those images of Capitol Hill ringed by armed troops and surrounded with razor-wire topped fences will be used by Democrats to smear their opponents in election ads for years to come.

Of course, it also sets the stage for their bogus impeachment and subsequent Senate trial proceedings. Look there, Trump and his devotees are so dangerous to the Republic that we now have more troops defending Washington D.C. than we did during the Civil War.  Of course, this sort of political theater on the Democrats part also reinforces the view of National Guardsmen serving as mere political props in their perverse melodrama.

Perhaps worse, the over-the-top reaction is just another intimidation tactic clearly intended to send a signal to their political opponents. It can't be properly viewed without considering the history of FISA abuse by the Obama administration against their political enemies, the self-censoring of news damaging to Democrats by the institutional news media, and the current talk by the political left of unleashing the mechanisms of the state against its own citizens with amped up domestic spying operations.  And it all combines to create a rather chilling effect against political speech.

All the more so, given the present context of the throttling and deplatforming of conservative voices and media-sponsored news censoring during and after the 2020 campaign, along with all the post-election talk of a need for the 'deprogramming' of Trump supporters, this extraordinary show of force was a subtle warning to any who don't want to unify under the boot of Biden's “very dark winter” agenda:   that of oppressive regulation, job-killing environmental extremism, and unchecked hordes of illegal aliens streaming into our country.

It was an in-your-face proclamation, saying, "We are in charge now!"

If you don't join them and forsake your support for the policies of the past four years, you will be shamed, demonized, doxxed, silenced, deplatformed, unfunded, and perhaps even fired. You better watch yourself. It's Unify... or else.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  1. https://www.battlefields.org/learn/articles/washingtons-civil-war-defenses-and-battle-fort-stevens

  2. Tangentially, it also significantly boosted attendance far above the usual dozen or so attendees we had become accustomed to see at Biden's campaign events.

  3. Katie Couric on Real Time with Bill Maher, January 15, 2021. Steve Hassan on CNN January 19, 2021. Eugene Robinson and Nikole Hannah-Jones on Morning Joe - on MSNBC January 12, 2021.  https://dailycaller.com/2021/01/12/washington-post-columnist-donald-eugene-robinson-trump-supporters-cult-deprogrammed/

Up To 25,000 Troops Descend On Washington For Biden's Inauguration |  Vermont Public Radio

Friday, January 8, 2021

Walzing Around the Truth

On Wednesday, Minnesota Governor Tim Walz issued an official statement concerning events unfolding in D.C.. If truth be told, had he only penned the final two paragraphs, he would have earned a modicum of respect from me, and perhaps, even displayed a bit of real statesmanship by calling on us all to be bigger and better persons.  But unfortunately, that was not to be.  Much like his Washington D.C. mentor, Speaker Pelosi, when given the chance, he just couldn't resist playing the role of the shamelessly opportunistic political propagandist and hypocritical pontificator.

The missed opportunity is truly a shame.

His statement, in its entirety, is reposted here:

Statement from Governor Walz:

“I see the events unfolding in our nation’s capital today not just as a Governor, but as a former high school history teacher. The last time our nation’s capital was under siege was more than 200 years ago when our country was at war with the British.”

“Today, it wasn’t a foreign nation that seized the capitol building and attempted an insurrection. It was citizens of our own country, incited by our president and enabled by many political leaders, who made a direct assault on our democracy.”

“In my classroom, I taught my students to see moments like this in a greater historical context. We must do that reflection today. President Trump has fanned the flames of hatred and undermined the sacred American institutions he swore an oath of office to protect. And whether it was through the support or silence of other politicians, he didn’t do it alone.”

“We must recognize that democracy cannot be taken for granted. We ask our soldiers to endanger their lives to defend our democracy abroad—we all have a duty to protect it here at home. That means toning down our rhetoric, bridging divides, and upholding our Democratic ideals.”

“History is being written today. What will our future students read about this moment in their textbooks? It’s on us to ensure today is the end of a chapter. And marks the beginning of when America stood up and stood together.”(1)


For a supposed teacher of history, he seems to have a very short memory of recent events - or at least a highly selective, politically self-serving one.

We all saw our nation's capitol (and many other Democrat controlled cities) come under full scale siege last summer by mindless, rioting BLM Marxists and Antifa's fascist bully-boy insurrectionists.  They vandalized national monuments and federal buildings, destroyed public property, and even torched the historic St. John's church located next to the White House, forcing the Secret Service to move the president to safety.   But apparently in the governor's closed mind, none of that really counts - at least as long as it advances the left's political agenda, its all good.

Closer to home, just this past summer, we saw Governor Walz, rendered helpless and dithering for days on end, weighing the political pros and cons of large scale mob violence against his personal political fortunes, while not just watching - but by his inaction, likely even fanning - the flames of destruction and mob violence.  Meanwhile, Minneapolis burned, police officers were injured, lives and livelihoods were destroyed, and whole neighborhoods were torn apart, until he finally allowed law enforcement and the National Guard to act in some measure of response.  Then, to add insult to injury, he had the audacity to ask the taxpayer to foot the bill for his feckless incompetence, while the perpetrators of it all, for the most part, got by scott free.

And yet now, this same governor lays blame at the feet of our President, the Republican party, and by implication even the GOP voter concerned about the real likelihood of voter fraud, for the mostly non-violent, short, but inexcusable actions of a few miscreant thugs.

By his own measure, Walz is far more culpable in his own actions and inactions than those whom he accuses - but then again, why have standards when you can have double standards?

We must be clear on this point:  Walz's indecision directly contributed to the normalizing of political violence and his inaction, by literally watching a city burn, was far more dangerous than the mere hyperbolic fanning of flames that he accuses his political adversaries of.
 

So we must respectfully ask the governor to what dubious intellectual or moral authority it is that he lays claim to?  What is this duplicitous moral foundation, that justifies him to so brazenly smear with broad brush his political opposition with the actions of a few, while refusing to acknowledge his own complicity in egregious events occurring under his own watch that went on far longer and were far more serious, deadly, and costly? 

Spelling check:  How many "Y"s are there in the word "hypocrisy"?



-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1 - https://mn.gov/governor/news/?__twitter_impression=true&fbclid=IwAR2PX31mMSyfw8HQrvWjm2tlNPL0ql45NhV3OOQ9e6WEjtt7VsCUTR8oMec&utm_source=&utm_medium=&utm_campaign=#/detail/appId/1/id/462163